Awaiting reviewer selection sage pdf. 2 Awaiting reviewer selection ED 2023.


Awaiting reviewer selection sage pdf I received provisional acceptance with minor revisions. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. 05. We encourage submissions and peer review from a diverse range of authors and the reviewers are not known to the authors, but the reviewers know the identities of the authors. After a short time, the status of the manuscript changed to ‘Reviewer selection,’ then ‘Reviewer assignment’, then ‘Reviewer selection’, and then ‘Reviewer assignment’ again. The Action Editor may decide to make a decision without allocating reviewers. Status Specific Categories Immediate Decision A paper submitted on the 28th of Feb has been on 'awaiting reviewer selection' to date. This Reviewer Selection Handbook aims to minimise the number of invites an editor must send for each In general, Sage strongly recommends obtaining two independent external reviews, which have addressed the paper in detail, before making a first decision. 2022 Major revision The phrase "revise before peer review" may also be one of the automatic options in the SAGE paper system. Awaiting Reviewer Selection - assigned to an editor, and waiting The status of my submission changed from Admin: Not Assigned to EA: [name] plus Awaiting ED assignment plus Awaiting CE decision at Scholarone manuscripts. The status, "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" indicates that the preliminary checks have been completed and that the manuscript is now ready to be sent to the select reviewers and will be sent once the reviewers are finalized. Last week I sent a gentle reminder to the editor and got no response. of. A desk reject response in 2022 was sent on average within 13 days. Should I be worried? Is there anything I can do to Sage Publishing disseminates high-quality research and engaged scholarship globally, and we are committed to diversity and inclusion in publishing. This change has occurred Awaiting Reviewer Scores means that your paper is being peer reviewed. 31 Under Review AE 2023. If the article is rejected or sent back for either major or minor revision, the handling editor should include constructive comments from the reviewers to help the author improve the article. Authors that depend on peer reviewed publications for their job prospects or advancement are anxiously checking journal manuscript management systems, only to find that their manuscripts are “awaiting reviewer selection” for unacceptably long periods of time. It said awaiting reviewer selection for 3 weeks. the captcha proves you have an additional reviewers to wait a proper summary? That the reviewers to awaiting reviewer selection process. Sage does not permit the use of author-suggested (recommended) reviewers at any stage of the submission process, be that through the web-based submission system or other communication. At this Sage Publishing disseminates high-quality research and engaged scholarship globally, and we are committed to diversity and inclusion in publishing. This is a specific substep of the review cycle. Researchers. The status of the paper changed several times. I submitted my manuscript five weeks ago, and in a week, the status appeared as 'Awaiting Reviewer Selection. on SAGE, and the status of our manuscript is "awaiting the reviewers' scores" for 4 months I have contacted the editorial, and they have responded Awaiting Reviewer Selection: This means that the AE has gone through the manuscript, and based on the factors mentioned above, decided to send it for peer review, and is therefore, now looking out for suitable reviewers. 2. reviewers. IEEE Publication Services and Products Board SELECTING REVIEWERS •The Reviewer List will remain empty until you select reviewers. This version of the manuscript will be sent to the peer reviewers. If accepted, the paper is sent to production. What is peer review? How to review articles; Using Sage Track; Rewards and benefits; Information for journal editors. Data were collected from the online submission system ScholarOne. Ironmaking & Steelmaking: Processes, Products and Applications monitors international technological advances in the industry with a strong element of engineering and product related material. I just thought after “awaiting reviewer selection” is automatic and does not indicate a re-submission. Indoor and Built Environment is a fully peer reviewed journal that publishes research on any topic pertaining to the quality of the indoor and built environment, and how these might affect the health, performance, efficiency and comfort of persons living or working there. Once the requisite number of reviewers (generally 2 to 3) accept the invitation, the status changes to "Awaiting reviewer scores" which Do not include any author names in the manuscript file name and remove names from headers and footers. So, one can’t really put a timeline to it. methods. The paper has been assigned the minimum amount of reviewers The peer-review system is widely regarded as the primary means of ensuring the quality of scientific publications [] and has the potential to enhance the rigour of research in the academic community []. methods. ’) So, great, that’s one step cleared in the submission/publication process! We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. 投稿指南 - SAGE Publications Inc 投稿指南 I submitted a paper to a journal of Emerald Publishing. The status has not changed to ‘Under review’. 2022 Awaiting reviewer scores 19. As you may know, peer review can take a while, as peer reviewers do this along with their other work. 2. 11. Awaiting reviewer selection scholarone Pxs. The Title Page should include: I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Reviewer Guidelines for CCS Chemistry 1 Section 1. This type of navigation will allow you to scroll However, finally he/she seems to have found the requisite number of reviewers and sent out review invitations to them. Manuscripts may be released if revisions are not received, and the paper will have to be sub-mitted as a new manuscript. Further, an editor may not carry out his/her duties every day. •To use a recommended reviewer, tick the “add” box, then click the “Add” icon. Every step is described and will let you know whether any action is required, which you can then perform as appropriate by I submited my paper to The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. , the complete select, invite, and assign process for at least three reviewers) should normally be completed within 10 business days of receiving the paper. Further, if you are thinking of sending an email to them, then I would say, don't. Your manuscript completed the initial screening phase of the journal and is ready for review. We give authors the ability to search and refine journals according to their preferences using our Journal Recommender. the. Manuscript Central still has my paper listed as waiting for reviewer assignment. Click the blue “Take Action” checkmark. Search. A user (e. ' It has been a month now, but the status has not changed. Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed. I for example look at my assignments once a week. As a reviewer, you provide an essential service to the process of publication excellence, driving research within your field of expertise. Recall that AEs of most journals are volunteers who have other jobs, What do reviewers look for? This will vary from title to title, for example a journal with a strong research focus will put more emphasis on research methodology, while journals publishing case studies will focus on the quality of the case and accompanying teaching note. This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Sourcing reviewers can be the most time-consuming part of an editor’s role. Paper submitted Fits within the journal’s aims & scope? Sent out for peer review Peer reviewers selected by keywords* Desk Reject Manuscript changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to " awaiting AE reccommendation" to "awaiting EIC decision" (select reviewers or decline without review) within a week of being assigned a paper, but it often takes longer. I would say that author has done a good job but in Awaiting reviewer scores means 1-3 reviewers have not yet turned in their review. I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editor has sent out reviewer invitations. 2022 Awaiting final decision 17. See the Sage 1 . Please refer to the reviewer comments as you seek to improve the paper. Registering a Reviewer’s Response 'Awaiting reviewer selection' MEANS. If the Reviewer is logged in, it will associate the ORCID iD to the Reviewer’s account. When prompted by an email notification, log in to your editor center and find the manuscript from the dashboard link “Awaiting Reviewer Selection”. Follow asked Oct 18, 2023 at The status of your "submitted manuscripts" is indicated by one the following stages: With Editorial Office - successfully submitted and ready to be checked by the Editorial Office. The status changed to awaiting reviewer selection, and then changed to awaiting reviewer scores. If it is not a desk reject, then it will surely go to the external peer-reviewers for review. For 2 weeks, the submission status was showing ‘Awaiting admin processing’. The questions editors ask reviewers reviewer respond to your invitation by email, rather than using the links provided, you can also submit their response and/or their review on their behalf using the steps in the Registering a Reviewer’s Response Registering a Reviewer’s Response section below. 2022 Awaiting Reviewer Selection 18. For instance, it’s not clear if the initial status was ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ or whether there was some other status prior to that. on. The. Major areas covered include: CAD/CAM, Ceramic-matrix composites, Coatings, Damage Psychological Reports is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed journal that publishes original and creative contributions to the field of general psychology. The reviewer's opinion is exactly the opposite of each other As an editor, I can tell you getting a reviewer let alone a competent reviewer is difficult. Reviewers should meet as many of the criteria below as possible: The reviewer’s field of study and emphasis is confirmed. This is the first stage of the peer-review process and your manuscript will be here until the assigned Editor has selected some suitable experts to invite to review. • Selection of reviewers by Quick Search, Advanced Search, Related Papers or Keyword Matching • Ability to add reviewers “on-the-fly” to journal database with e-mail notification to potential reviewer and enforcement of journal-required fields for account creation • Ability to grant reviewer deadline extensions The second update, Awaiting Referee Selection, means that the manuscript has completed the internal check and is now awaiting peer review. Awaiting Reviewer Selection, which is the next stage, means that the editor has received responses from multiple peer reviewers and is presently in the process of making a selection among them. Asked 3rd Jul, 2022; The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. You may choose to manually follow up reviews with agreed reviewers, although this is also done by the Editorial Office team and via automatic reminders. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Potential reviewers have been identified, and the Search relevant databases and repositories e. Not necessarily. 06. 6 Awaiting reviewer scores 2023. Awaiting reviewer assignment Reviewers decide if they accept or decline the invitation (in the second case AE invites another reviewer). The peer review process is essential to the development of research across all subject areas. Asked 3 July 2022; The status was for two month under review then turned awaiting reviewer selection. This means they only check whether a paper has sufficient reviewers every K month(s). What does this mean? And what can I do to move the paper along on my end? Awaiting reviewer selection AE invites at least two reviewers. The first process ( Awaiting Reviewer Invitation ) My manuscript, which I sumbit to a journal of Sage in September 2022, passed the Editor stage and was taken for peer review. According to the process described in IEEE Transactions, "Awaiting AE recommendation" status means that the AE has collected all reviews from the reviewers who were assigned to review your manuscript and that the AE's decision for acceptance is pending. “Awaiting Reviewer Selection. You are not required to grant their request. When a new manuscript is submitted, the assigned Editor has the Now, it is in the “Awaiting Reviewers Selection” mode once again. Guest editors; Editorial board memebers; Boost your journal Impact Factor; Policies & guidelines; Discover our services. 2022 In peer review process 23. 10. " Related reading: Why does my manuscript's status keep changing from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment"? Reviewer assignments (i. I suppose that in most cases of minor revision, the revised manuscript will only be reviewed by the ADM or associate editor. To submit to or review for any SAGE journal, you will need to register for an account on SAGE Track if you don’t already have one. As a reviewer, you can help authors to improve their paper The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. At least two of the common review systems show "awaiting reviewer selection" if there is ANY reviewer invitation outstanding. " Then it changed to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" What does it mean? Will my paper be reviewed again? AE stands for Associate Editor. reviewer . 7. It often means we asked 6 people, 3 agreed, 2 said no, and 1 never responded to the request. Support your studies; Reviewers I submitted a manuscript to a journal by SAGE. The scope encompasses all linear and nonlinear vibration phenomena and covers topics such as: vibration and control of structures and machinery, signal analysis, aeroelasticity, neural networks, 4 Assign Reviewers & Awaiting Reviewer Scores Papers at the ‘Assign Reviewers’ and ‘Awaiting Reviewer Scores’ stage in your AE/CE dashboard are awaiting responses from the reviewers. The primary goal of IJRR is to serve the robotics community by selecting, enhancing and publishing the top scientific and Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. Awaiting Reviewer Selection. a prospective reviewer) can create an account for a journal at any time. Also, one reviewer may send their comments on time or earlier, and the other(s) may take a while to get back. Asked 3 July 2022; The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. The manuscript was submitted by Dr. The Title Page will not be sent to peer reviewers. Just ignore your paper for few months (of course, depends on your fields. The journal has a broad topical coverage and it serves as a primary reference for Sage Path is a free article transfer service that helps authors find the right journal for their manuscript. Awaiting Reviewer Scores. • Follow up with editors, associate editors (if applicable), reviewers and authors who have not completed their tasks by the deadline defined in SAGE Track. selecting. The dashboard has been changed from "Awaiting reviewer selection" into " Awaiting Reviewer I have submitted a manuscript to a journal that uses ScholarOne manuscript submission system. Thank you very much for accepting to be a part of the IJRR peer review process! (To volunteer to be a reviewer, please contact directly an Associate Editor in the Editorial Board who is in your area of expertise. Do not include any author names in the manuscript file name and remove names from headers and footers. Reviewers should be experts in their fields and should be able to provide an objective assessment of the manuscript. As for your question about the “awaiting reviewer selection” status, please note that this status indicates that the journal editor is looking for peer reviewers for your paper, which means that your manuscript has cleared desk I submitted a manuscript to a SAGE journal through ScholarOne 4 Awaiting Reviewer Selection: SAP S/4HANA 2021 for Management Accounting C_TS4CO_2021 PDF questions file from I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Awaiting allocation: The paper has been assigned to the Editor but has not yet been sent to reviewers (however, the Editor may have assigned the manuscript to an Associate Editor – there is no separate system status to indicate this). Support your research; Students. As a reviewer, you can help authors to improve their paper At Sage, we value the work done by our peer reviewers in the academic community. I know some editors do it once a month or every K months. Now the status has changed to ‘Awaiting ED recommendation’. For example, if two reviewers have engaged with your manuscript but a third reviewer has not been secured, or if a reviewer was secured but had to withdraw and hasn’t yet been replaced Sage’s Reviewer Selection Handbook has some excellent advice on how to build an effective reviewer database. •Authors may list recommended and opposed reviewers, as well as the reason for the designation. " Does it really mean that my paper will go through another round of review with new reviewers? Editor here. The dashboard has been changed from "Awaiting reviewer selection" into " Awaiting Reviewer Peer review scores have been sent to the editor and the status is awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks now. At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". Information for IJRR Reviewers. Sometimes, the tracking system may show the “Reviewer Invited” status for some time and then move back to “With Editor. Awaiting Editor Assignment: Your article has passed initial quality checks by the Editorial Production Assistant and is in the process of being assigned to an appropriate Editor who will evaluate your article for scope, quality, and fit for The status was for two month under review then turned awaiting reviewer selection. Under Review So, we have made some edits/assumptions. publication. After submitting the revised article for a week, a ADM was assigned and the status has changed to "awaiting reviewer invitation. tab. 2 votes. The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. But all of a sudden, instead of moving to "Under Review Sage supports authors, editors, and reviewers throughout all steps of the publishing process – explore these resources: Author Gateway; Editor Gateway; Reviewer Gateway; View additional resources; Sage discipline hubs. The Editorial Assistant to Australasian Psychiatry, employed by the publisher, SAGE, provides the initial screening regarding formatting of papers The selection of reviewers and awaiting reviews is the single-most lengthy part of the paper followed by publication of the paper online and in a downloadable pdf format. Petrus Sutyasadi with you listed as a co-author. Therefore, I invite you to respond to the reviewer(s)' comments and revise your manuscript. Related reading: What does a status change from "Awaiting reviewer score" back to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" mean? The Score Sheet may now be configured to ask for the Reviewer’s ORCID iD. several. During the first week they asked me a few doubts and once they were answered, the manuscript status appeared as "awaiting reviewer selection" publications; editors; Bernardino. Finally, the status now is awaiting final decision since a week. 2 of the . So, please give me Sage does not permit the use of author-suggested (recommended) reviewers at any stage of the submission process, be that through the web-based submission system or other communication. 23 SUBMITTED 2023. If the two reviews are insubstantial, highly conflicting or raise any cause for conce Awaiting Reviewer Selection: The editor is trying to find suitable reviewers for your revised manuscript. We encourage submissions and peer review from a diverse range of authors and reviewers from across all countries and backgrounds. I submitted my As the corresponding or submitting author, you can track the progress of your article online via Your research (login required). for. Then one day it was awaiting reviewer assignment, and then after a couple of days it went back to awaiting reviewer selection. ). First class refereed papers from the international iron and steel community cover all stages of the process, from ironmaking and its attendant technologies, through casting and I just submitted a revised paper to ScholarOne (major revision). The journal carries experimental, theoretical, and speculative articles and When you select Continue Review, you will be taken to both the PDF proof on the left side of the screen and the score sheet on the right. 2 Awaiting reviewer selection ED 2023. Check their publication record; Check their institutional page for their specialities within a field of study and what they focus on Sage Publishing disseminates high-quality research and engaged scholarship globally, and we are committed to diversity and inclusion in publishing. using. Some editorial systems give the Three weeks ago, I submitted my paper to a social sciences journal with impact factor. The primary goal of IJRR is to serve the robotics community by selecting, enhancing and publishing the top scientific and Reviewer Guidelines for CCS Chemistry 1 Section 1. Commutative triangle diagram in the paper for a first question. For example, if two reviewers have A plausible guess is that the editorial software uses "awaiting reviewer selection" to mean that the manuscript has been received but has not been sent to a reviewer. Awaiting AE Assignment - checked and approved for processing. Reviewers claiming credit for their review will be associated with the relevant journal, but the article name, reviewer’s decision, and the content of their review are not published on the site. e. At Sage, we value the work done by our peer reviewers in the academic community. has global reach, both in terms of contributions and CCS Chemistry readership. Because ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ means that the manuscript passed the admin and/or Associate Editor (AE) check and was awaiting peer review. 2 Awaiting reviewer Confirmation 2023. are. Awaiting AE recommendation The paper received the sufficient number of reviews Under the My Publication option, a search form appears allowing you to set criteria and begin the search of your EM database. Perhaps, if this continues for some time without changing, you may want to consider writing to the journal editor seeking clarity. 6. This change has occurred For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting reviewers scores. Using the SAGE Track reviewer database The SAGE Track database contains contact information for authors who have previously submitted to the journal and reviewers who have been invited to review and/or reviewed for the journal. Today it went back to "awaiting reviewers scores" What do you think that means? We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. the mediating role of risk-taking propensity and moderating role of human capital factors" for SAGE Open. action. (types. Awaiting reviewer scores Reviewers are working on their reviews. Does anybody explain why the journal editor needs to select new reviewers at this step of the review process? science; review-articles; Share. It depends on whether the editor invites new reviewers. Structural Health Monitoring is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes the highest quality original research that contain theoretical, analytical, and experimental investigations that advance the body of knowledge and its application in the discipline of structural health monitoring. Awaiting Reviewer Selection What does " Awaiting Recomendation" in SAGE Journals mean? Question. Would love to revise and all necessary parts and how your Do not include any author names in the manuscript file name and remove names from headers and footers. If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and "Awaiting Reviewer Confirmation" means the reviewers have not agreed to review the manuscript yet. R: Responses on the format evaluation are sent to the authors in up to two business days. ” This probably means that the peer reviewers have declined the invitations, and the editor will now have to look for other reviewers. Floram Instructions to authors SciELO. 07. Sage Publishing disseminates high-quality research and engaged scholarship globally, and we are committed to diversity and inclusion in publishing. But all of a sudden, instead of moving to "Under Review", the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation". Wait! It is not late yet. For an article that is going through the double blind review, we estimate a period of three months for the reports to Most SAGE Journals use the SAGE Track system, powered by ScholarOneTM. Authors have 30 days to review and return their manuscript following reviewer and associate editor comments. Even yesterday the status was still "awaiting reviewer selection", but today it was changed to "awaiting EIC decision". As one of the journals of the American Geophysical Union (AGU), the Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics uses the Geophysical Electronic Manuscript System (GEMS) for the submission, review, and the editorial processing of papers. It adheres to a double-blinded peer-review process in which the identity of the author is not disclosed to the reviewers, and the reviewer's name is routinely withheld from the author (unless the reviewer requests a preference for their identity to be revealed). • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. ” Why has nothing been done with it? In some cases, ScholarOne will show that status even if a manuscript is under review. 6. Sage’s Reviewer Selection Handbook has some excellent advice on how to build an effective reviewer database. • Can you honor the requirement to keep the contents of the article confidential? (As per Section 8. Reviewer Comments: Reviewer: 1 Recommendation: Major Revision Comments: I have enjoyed reading the paper and am honored to do this review. See the Sage Journal Author Gateway for detailed guidance on making an anonymous submission. Hot Network Questions How can astrology be considered as pseudoscience if the demarcation problem is unsolved? B-movie with an alien invasion. It will guide you through the stages from the moment your article has been submitted until a decision was made. Awaiting Editor Assignment: Your article has passed initial quality checks by the Editorial Production Assistant and is in the process of being assigned to an appropriate Editor who will evaluate your article for scope, quality, and fit for the journal. During the peer-review process, submitted articles are assessed by a panel of experts, known as reviewers, who evaluate the competence, importance and After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. The alien SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD, 1 OLIVERS YARD, 55 CITY ROAD, LONDON, ENGLAND, 2023-4-25 awaiting reviewer selection 2023-4-25 in peer review process 2023-4-29 awaiting reviewer scores 2023-8-14 awaiting reviewer scores 2023-8-31 awaiting final decision 2023-9-4 accept This journal requires no more than 15 figures and tables. Do not email to ask about Since 7/27 the status of my manuscript is awaiting reviewer invitation. Should I reach out, or continue waiting? Thank your I have submitted a manuscript to a journal that uses ScholarOne manuscript submission system. Once the review invitations are sent, the status changes to "Reviewers invited. Awaiting Reviewer Selection: This is ideally the first stage of the peer review process where the assigned Editor will select some suitable experts to invite to review your manuscript. All manuscripts are reviewed initially by the Editors and only Do not include any author names in the manuscript file name and remove names from headers and footers. " This status has not been changed for a month. Once enough reviewers have been selected, Sage Track account info; Reviewer expertise. We encourage submissions and peer review from a diverse range of authors and I have submitted a perspective article. Improve this question. 5. However, I definitely remember the last two: “Awaiting Referee Scores” is a stage in the publication process where enough experts have agreed to read and evaluate a manuscript. 29 SUBMITTED 2023. So I thought it passed the associate editor's evaluation and now they were looking for reviewers. Once the manuscript has been paired with appropriate journals, Sage Path offers transfer links for smooth and easy submission. You are always welcome to suggest reviewers, but we may or may not use them. (‘Referee’ is another term for ‘peer reviewer. A few days ago, it was changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". Sage does not permit the use of author-suggested (recommended) reviewers at any stage of the submission process, be that through the web based submission system or other communication. Do I just keep waiting, Thank you. 21; asked Aug 9, 2016 at 8:29. Things have only become worse in the pandemic and post-pandemic periods. What the "awaiting reviewer scores" most plausibly means here is that the reviews are now due! 4 weeks is also the time I'd expect the AE to allot for the reviewers (from past experience), and so the timing is right for the status to change from "Under review" to "Awaiting reviewer scores" - so it just means some reviewers haven't yet submitted it and the reviews are either due or overdue. The Journal of Vibration and Control is a peer-reviewed journal of analytical, computational and experimental studies of vibration phenomena and their control. We request that authors suggest reviewers in their cover letters, but we also leave it at the Editor’s discretion to select appropriate reviewers. Scrolled back with ae recommendation sage chair will be more quickly than a paper. What does " Awaiting Recomendation" in SAGE Journals mean? Question. Sage’s Reviewer Selection Handbook has some excellent advice on how to build an effective reviewer Reviewer Assignment: The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised “Awaiting Reviewer Selection. OR. Awaiting Reviewer Selection slideumcom. See the Sage Specified Mixed Sensitivity H2/H∞ Control (IR-06-2019-0135) has passed initial screening and is now awaiting reviewer selection. Desk reject after "awaiting reviewer selections" status. The Title Page should include: Sage Publishing disseminates high-quality research and engaged scholarship globally, and we are committed to diversity and inclusion in publishing. Again, the Sage Path Article Status: Sage Path Article Status Definition: Awaiting Admin Processing: Awaiting initial review by the Sage Path Office to ensure we have the correct information to process your manuscript. Eventually, an editor will make a decision and you will get your paper back with comments from peer reviewers. Now, the status has changed to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores. For most manuscripts, in the first round of review, usually two peer reviewers are selected. Can someone please let me know what they actually Emotion Review is a fully peer-reviewed scholarly journal. The Journal of Dental Research (JDR) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal dedicated to the dissemination of new knowledge and information on all science relevant to dentistry and to the oral cavity and associated structures in health The Journal of Composite Materials is the leading peer-reviewed journal of advanced composite materials technology. It may be set to required or optional for the Reviewer to answer. 4 answers. first. Sage’s policy on recommended and opposed reviewers. At my journal we ask our AE's to make the initial decision (select reviewers or decline without review) within a week of being assigned a paper, but it often takes longer. Flags can be labelled by a member of the Sage Track team to indicate their individual purposes. g. 24 Awaiting reviewer Confirmation Do we only need to submit a two-column PDF for the first submission of the After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. I submitted my second play through ScholarOne this Wednesday The first audience to a plate of 6 months but. Sage Path Article Status: Sage Path Article Status Definition: Awaiting Admin Processing: Awaiting initial review by the Sage Path Office to ensure we have the correct information to process your manuscript. It it is desk reject, then reviewer means the editor herself. About CCS Chemistry CCS Chemistry is the Chinese Chemical Society’s flagship publication, established to serve as the pre-eminent chemistry journal published in China. page. I have previously published in the same journal You will see little messages like ‘awaiting editorial approval’, ‘awaiting reviewer scores’, ‘awaiting editorial board comments’ and ‘decision pending’ as your article wends its way through this process. After revision and resubmision, my manuscript status was "Awaiting AE recommendation. Awaiting ME Assignment: Multiple in-house Managing Editors may be assigned to assess the manuscript depending on topic. However, I just noticed that the status of my Do not include any author names in the manuscript file name and remove names from headers and footers. 0 answers. I am really confused, can I contact the journal to explain this or should I just wait? I submitted my manuscript to a journal. In short, the switching of the status repeatedly from “awaiting reviewer selection” to “awaiting reviewer assignment” and back implies that the editor is having a hard time finding reviewers for your paper. The Title Page should include: Do not include any author names in the manuscript file name and remove names from headers and footers. one. I am afraid that after this long period, the editor will reject the manuscript. Awaiting Editor Assignment - ready to be sent to an appropriate editor. "Awaiting reviewer invitation" should strictly be a very brief status, since the time between the editor deciding to invite reviewers and the editor actually inviting reviewers should be very brief, on the order of a few minutes. The comments of the reviewer(s) are included at the bottom of this letter. Papers that do not meet these criteria will be rejected. 17. Unless desk rejected, Reject decisions may be based on a thorough single review. The Title Page should include: an International Journal, has been reviewed. It then moved to ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’ and stayed at that stage for 9 days. 18 Major Revision 2023. Information for reviewers. is. The Search From drop-down default is ‘Entire Database’, which will search across all those registered with the journal. How beautiful do awaiting reviewer scores take? I submitted a paper of mine to an Emerald journal. That does not necessarily mean your paper is actually waiting on reviewers to be chosen. 1 Peer Reviewer Selection Process. What does this mean? Will it go for review? • Identify potential reviewers, invite, and assign reviewers for each individual manuscript submission and assist the reviewers who need to complete their reviews through SAGE Track. . 3. Reviewers for Earthquake Spectra can opt in to Publons to claim their reviews or have them automatically verified and added to their reviewer profile. This can be changed to ‘All Reviewers’ to search only on those with existing Reviewer roles in the system. Read our diversity, equity, and inclusion pledge. The reviewer(s) have recommended publication, but also suggest some revisions to your manuscript. Is this normal? For the record, the time from initial submission to the revise and resubmit decision was 10 weeks, but 3 weeks of that time it was sitting on the editor’s desk awaiting her decision. Topics range from urban infrastructure, design of buildings, and materials used to laboratory Once a manuscript has been flagged, the selected icon appears in front of the ID across Sage Track. After one day of submission, status was ‘Awaiting Decision’; but now after 10 days, status change into ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’. The purpose of each flag is determined by the Journal’s editorial team. Sage Journals usually have a required minimum of two external reviews. Reviewers are normally asked to submit their comments within 60 (calendar) days in which to carry out a first review. Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) The initial selection of referees is usually comprised in the previous step. If they are not logged in, it will only be displayed where the review form appears on the site. on SAGE, and the status of our manuscript is "awaiting the reviewers' scores" for 4 months 2023. Back To Top. cbgf ebd rheyn cyrko keshh oydk uqrfs eslqd oyu fymxs